2/15/26 Sunday Noon
I have been asked why I concentrate on only 3 weather models. Well, I usually only share 2 or 3. But I look at nearly every one of them.
It takes a while to crop them down and label locations. So, in the interest of time, here are some of the models I look at besides the “Big Three”.
The other benefit to not cropping these down is that if you look at the bottom right of the map you will see MAX with a number next to it. That is the maximum output amount. In this case, it says 50.9. Referring to 50.9 inches, which just happens to refer to that little pink dot near Wolf Creek.
NBM (National Blend Of Models) hi res.

NBM v5 (experimental)

Canadian GDPS(Experimental)

UK Met- Apparently, they don’t worry too much about snow in the UK because there is no snow output parameter. This is in liquid equivalent (inches)

ICON (German) again in liquid, but for a different reason–it handles snow horribly.
![]()
Big Three
European

GFS

Canadian

You can’t help but notice that they all share a similar story, which makes it a pretty high-confidence event.
Adding to the confidence is Probabilistic Guidance (say that 5 times fast), which shows a 75% chance of 1 to 2+ feet of snow in the mountains. They arrive at that number by running numerous simulations. That is a very high number. I don’t recall the last time I saw such a high number for that much snow!






If you noticed this map ends up with a ridge back over us, it’s too early to worry about that.
