10/12/26 Monday 4:00 am
I am starting to suffer from model precipitation error fatigue. That’s what it seems like, but the error is in the timing, and it may work in our favor.
I woke up and looked out the window so many times overnight hoping for wet pavement. I finally gave up and started digging into the model runs, satellite, and radar.
Last night and overnight, the models initialized well. They picked up on the strengthening low pressure to our west, and the stationary front temporarily slowing the low’s progression and the associated cold front. This now gets very interesting…
Gut reaction: “Models have been wrong so far; why should we think they are going to correct over the next 48-72 hours?”
It occurs to me that the models are no longer accounting for post-tropical conditions over the SW deserts. In their interpretations, this is a typical low-pressure system tracking over the SW US. That is not the case.
Hurricanes/Cyclones feast off of moisture and warm water. They sometimes stall over an area with plenty of fuel; they undergo an eyewall replacement, then, as they keep “feeding”, they grow more powerful.
What does all of this have to do with a hurricane? What is a hurricane in the simplest explanation? It is a low-pressure system…
In its wake, Rachel left an inordinate amount of moisture for the low-pressure system to feast on. Think of it as a land hurricane that has stalled over a fuel source.
How do I know this? Let’s get back to the current surface map.

The stationary front is indicated by the alternating red and blue “flags” along the boundary. Now look at the low-pressure system along the California/Nevada border, marked by blue flags. The blue flags indicate it is a cold front. Notice how it looks like a comma? It’s leaning back. This is called a negatively tilted trough, which means the trough is strengthening.
I anticipate the stationary front will either break away from the rest of the long wave. That long wave currently extends all the way to Labrador. Or the whole thing will drop across the Upper Midwest, ushering in very cold air. Either solution would bring that stationary front in and let the low pressure start moving our way again.
Wow, I am guilty of getting too deep into this discussion. There was no easier way to explain my take on what is happening. One more thing as I try to wrap this up.
Things to keep in mind: Timing isn’t set in stone yet. All models are still showing significant rain and snow. Higher amounts than I have seen in the last few days. Models show this low weakening as it is approaching. They currently show a depth of 552 mb when it arrives, which indicates snow down to around 8,000 ft. However, accumulation that low depends on the time of arrival.
Well, the low isn’t weakening right now as the model indicates. If the low continues to strengthen, it could get deeper; 546 mb indicates snow levels of 6,500 feet. I am not forecasting snow that low; I am just trying to put it in perspective.
I will be back this afternoon to recap new model runs and play by play with the surface maps.
Venmo: @Jeff-Givens-11
OR
Cash App users: $JGDWG
ZELLE: jgivenscbr@gmail.com
Prefer to send a check? Click below to request instructions.